<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AdverClast.com - Latest Comments in On Strategy and Google</title><link>http://adverclast.disqus.com/</link><description>A Chronicle of Disruptive Advertising</description><atom:link href="https://adverclast.disqus.com/on_strategy_and_google/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:07:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On Strategy and Google</title><link>http://adverclast.com/uncategorized/on-strategy-and-google/#comment-4865191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite simple, and quite useful. well done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r. titus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 07:07:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Strategy and Google</title><link>http://adverclast.com/uncategorized/on-strategy-and-google/#comment-4574892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Michael, this is a very nice Google strategy analysis primer, well done. BTW, I would add that Google is undertaking Chrome specifically to keep the HTML + JavaScript software stack viable by making it fast enough to compete with Adobe Flash/Air and MSFT's Silverlight platforms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In doing so, I believe they are merely trying to keep the core Web infrastructure open, as they are donating most of this tech back to the open source community. This is not primarily a move against FireFox, as some commentators initially thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AlexSchleber</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>